Citizens for a Livable Cranbrook Society provides grassroots leadership and an inclusive process, with a voice for all community members, to ensure that our community grows and develops in a way that incorporates an environmental ethic, offers a range of housing and transportation choices, encourages a vibrant and cultural life and supports sustainable, meaningful employment and business opportunities.

Friday, June 1, 2012

MLA Bennett's Response to Agrologist

From the Tyee:


The chair of a legislative committee that reported on the cosmetic use of pesticides has dismissed people who support a ban as "politically motivated left wing conspiracy theorists."


It's an email outburst that has critics questioning whether Kootenay East MLA Bill Bennett's biases made him a poor choice for Premier Christy Clark to pick as chair for the Special Committee on Cosmetic Pesticides.  In a May 30 message to Bill Wells, a retired agrologist in the Kootenay town of Kaslo, Bennett wrote, "I'll take the 350 scientists at Health Canada over the politically motivated left wing conspiracy theorists any day."  


Wells had written to Bennett calling the committee's recommendation against a ban "disgraceful" and expressing "disappointment that a committee of the BC Legislature would be so prejudiced in reaching their 'decision' that they ignore and humiliate those who would come to them to provide them with actual facts and knowledgeable guidance."


Bennett's first response to Wells said, "I am pleased to hear that you can read and encourage you to put your skill to work reading the Special Committee's Report. Perhaps even an old dog can learn a new trick!"


When Wells wrote back saying the chemical industry has undue influence on Health Canada's Pest Management Regulatory Agency, Bennett responded: "And a commie under every rock and the grassy hill in Dallas and all corporations and all that jazz. Sorry, I'm not a conspiracy theorist." 


During its hearings, the Special Committee on Cosmetic Pesticides heard from a wide range of stakeholders and the public. "Of the 7,300 e-questionnaires submitted, almost 5,000 supported a ban on the sale and use of pesticides for cosmetic purposes," the committee's report said.


Complete article:http://thetyee.ca/News/2012/05/31/BillBennettComments/
For the actual email threads and conversations:
http://thetyee.ca/Blogs/TheHook/BC-Politics/2012/05/31/BennettPest/

2 comments:

  1. The Commie under the rock??June 1, 2012 at 11:25 PM

    Oh, Billy Boy!! When will you ever learn? "A commie under every rock". That's so original coming from you of all people. Come on, Billy Boy. Time to change your script writer. Maybe even time to hit the road???

    ReplyDelete
  2. A ban because you think it will save the world, like the Toronto city council banning plastic bags without studying the issue, just removes freedoms from others. I don't know Wells but I have met some of the Health Canada researchers who are forced to go to extreme lengths to try to find some negative effects from many pesticides. One pesticide, Warfarin, is now used to save people with heart problems and another, Botox, is used for cosmetic reasons. I agree, all pesticides are poisons formulated or discovered to kill what humans consider as pests. But many pests either carry or produce toxins and bacteria that will kill their hosts or others, like the pine beetle which carries a vector that kills pines. I assume that saving a pine would be considered "cosmetic" by many but economically necessary by others. Same for fetch, tansy, thistles or ticks.

    ReplyDelete