Cranbrook’s fire
hall is a public building and a public building it should remain
Perceptions by
Gerry Warner
It was early
in 1929 when citizens of the fledgling community of Cranbrook took a big step
into the future.
At issue was a false-fronted, wooden building next
door to City Hall that served as the city’s third fire hall in pioneer days. A
bent-up, old crow-bar hung in front of the building and when a fire broke out
someone would bang on it until the loud clanging roused the volunteer fire team
into action and they would trundle off with a hose and reel to the source of
the flames.
But on March 25, 1929 the far sighted citizens of
Cranbrook decided they needed something better and reached deep into their
pockets and by a margin of 269 to 27 approved a bylaw to build a new $31,000
fire hall. Thirty-one thousand dollars was a lot of money on the verge of the
Great Depression, but an editorial in the March 28, 1929 Cranbrook Courier
congratulated the City on its move.
The real civic booster, the editorial said, “is the
fellow who at all times is interested in all things for community betterment .
. . he realizes that the success of the whole community is his individual
success. Likewise, he makes his individual success reach out in good uses for
the entire community.”
Oh that we had such far-sighted civic boosters in
Cranbrook today!
Then again, maybe we do. At a recent City Council
meeting an item was pulled from the agenda at the last minute that would have
resulted in the city’s ornate, heritage, downtown fire hall being put up for
sale to the highest bidder. This despite the fact that the previous Council had
signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Cranbrook District Arts
Council (CDAC) to potentially repurpose the building as an Arts Centre and
Gallery. A new Council, of course, is entitled to set its own priorities, but
in moving so quickly to tear up the MOU to explore the possibility of creating
the city’s first true, stand-alone arts centre and gallery can the current
council claim to be acting in good faith? Hardly.
What’s the hurry here?
Since 1972, the CDAC has worked its buns off to
elevate Cranbrook as the artistic centre of the region by promoting local
artists, staging artistic exhibitions and bringing renowned artists to the
community. Just look at this season alone: “Let Them Run,” an exhibition of
paintings and sculpture dedicated to the restoration of the ancient Kootenay
salmon runs. “Small Glories,” an in-house folk concert, “Stories of the Yukon,”
by a renowned northern story teller and a “Junior Arts Exhibition” by local
kindergarten to Grade 6 budding artists.
Not every exhibition draws a good crowd, but this is
partly because the cramped, rented facility operates in a space that looks more
like an office than a gallery.
But think what it would be like if the arts council
operated out of a downtown, heritage building with the space to show major
exhibitions like the Touchstones Museum of Art and History in Nelson, a city
only half the size of Cranbrook.
In anticipation of Council falling through on the MOU,
the CDAC has been furiously fund-raising and applying for every possible grant
they can obtain to create a facility that would do Cranbrook proud and give the
city a sensibility it now lacks and would add another civic attraction.
It would be as the Courier editorial writer said a
facility for “community betterment” and “reach out in good uses for the entire
community.” The Cranbrook Fire Hall was built as a public building, paid for by
the public and served the public for more than half-a-century. That’s how it
should remain. It would be a sacrilege to sell this building off for private
use.
Gerry Warner is a
retired journalist and former Cranbrook City Councillor.
No comments:
Post a Comment