Citizens for a Livable Cranbrook Society provides grassroots leadership and an inclusive process, with a voice for all community members, to ensure that our community grows and develops in a way that incorporates an environmental ethic, offers a range of housing and transportation choices, encourages a vibrant and cultural life and supports sustainable, meaningful employment and business opportunities.

Friday, August 17, 2012

Mining B.C.’s Forests for Ruin and Profit

Perceptions by Gerry Warner
So the solution to the B.C. forest industry crisis is to cut more timber, according to the report of the Special Committee on Timber Supply released in Victoria this week. Who can deny now that the fox is in charge of the hen house when it comes to forest management in our once verdant province?
Oh, I know “Supernatural  B.C,”  the “best place on earth” according to the current government,  is still largely green. But take a flight to Vancouver sometime and a different picture emerges. When you look out the window you don’t exactly see a sea of green like the glossy tourist brochures say. What you see is a sea of clear-cuts from one end of the province to the other.  North/south, east/west, it doesn’t matter . The pock-marked landscape runs virtually from the city limits of Cranbrook to Vancouver and when you fly over Vancouver Island, it’s the same sickening scene only worse.
Not a pretty sight and it’s there for a reason.
For over 100 years, we’ve been mining -- not logging -- the once magnificent woods of  B.C. And when you mine a material it’s gone. You don’t get it back. It’s been the same with logging in this besotted province. What were the first trees logged shortly after Captain Vancouver sailed down the West Coast? Old growth Douglas firs that used to soar straight as an arrow more than 200 feet high at the corner of Hastings and Granville and up and down the coast.
The British Navy, then the greatest navy on earth, found those Douglas fir logs to be perfect for spars on their sailing ships and handy for building forts and stockades to keep the indigenous people at bay. And by the time steam came and sail boats were a thing of the past, those same Douglas firs were used to build homes for the settlers that flooded into Vancouver, Victoria and the rest of the province . And it also made fortunes for lumber barons like H. R. MacMillan and hundreds of others who became rich as our patrimony was ripped from the ground and used all over the province and exported around the world, especially to the U.S., which had already ravaged its timber resources and now Asia where the forests were cut eons ago.
Are you getting the picture?
We haven’t been “logging” the forest in the conventional sense of the term which implies forest stewardship to ensure there will always be trees to log. We’ve been clear-cutting almost every last tree for quick profit and letting nature take care of the future. Don’t believe me? Well consider a key report recommendation that suggests more use of  “marginally economic forest types.”  Why do we have to turn to the margins of B.C.’s once great forest lands when we once possessed the greatest temperate rain forest on earth?
It can be difficult for the average layman to appreciate this because when you look out your window almost anywhere in B.C. you see trees. But most of those trees are already committed to the major timber companies in the province or not considered commercial to log.
And why have we fallen into this quicksand of forestry woe? We waste almost as much timber as we log

Logging slash (waste) on Bugaboo Creek Aug. 3, 2012. 
and this has left us in a silvicultural hole bigger than some of the open pit mines in the province.
If you want more proof  look at the report’s admission that we’ve fallen so far back in recent years in keeping forest inventory that we can’t even make a reasonable estimate of  how many trees we’ve got left. And if you’re looking to apportion blame, it’s not just the current government. It’s all provincial governments for the past hundred years that have taken a three blind mice approach to forestry.
And don’t fall for the line that we can blame it all on the pine beetle epidemic. Yes, there’s a pine beetle crisis out there, but that was a crisis largely of our own making because for years we’ve planted primarily pine beetle in areas that were better suited for other species.
In response to the all-party report, Forests Minister Steve Thomson says he’s going to come up with an “action plan” within a week. I say to Mr. Thomson with respect that he’s dreaming in Technicolor if he thinks a solution to 100 years of abusing the forest can be found in a week.

Gerry Warner is a retired journalist and Cranbrook City Councillor. His views are his own and he does not speak for Council.

3 comments:

  1. To add a little balance to your viewpoint... have you noticed on your flights over BC that the Lower Mainland/Vancouver is the worst clearcut & polluted area in all of BC? That area can never be reclaimed; however, nature adapts & accommodates our need for urban areas as well as our need for wood products. I frequently fly across our province & see a green Supernatural BC, not the exaggerated devastation you claim.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The only can conclusion that I can come to after reading Mr Warner's post is that he has decided that reading the report from the Special Committee is not required in order to comment on it. With all due respect to Mr Warner this is a truly embarrassing coulmn that has less to do with what is contained in the report and more to do with his "Perceptions".

    I have read the report and I recommend that Mr Warner do the same. Their are no "solutions" presented in the report, only recommendations to assess the damage the Mountain Pine Beetle has had on the timber inventories of the central interior and develop a plan to bridge the gap in the mid-term (20 to 60 years) timber supply that will keep people working in communities that have already suffered through the devestating effects the beetle infestation has had over the last two decades.
    The recommendations contained in the report have been made by a commiitee, the "foxes" that Mr Warner so disrespectfully refers to, that include MLA's from the ridings most deeply impacted as well as Columbia-Revelstoke MLA Norm MacDonald. This committee took over 650 submissions from stake holders who include not only industry but First Nations, enviromental and community groups and local governments.
    Mr Warner's conclusions regarding the use of "marginally economic forest types" are not only incorrect and irrevelvant to what is contained within the report but have been made, in my opinion, to intentionally mislead the reader to coming to the conclusion Mr Warner has invented.
    "Don't believe me?" Take a look at what is in the report and then re-read Mr Warner's column which I beleive can only be described as a callous and embarrassing effort.

    Ken Dunsire

    ReplyDelete
  3. If Jerry Warner is so wrong, Guys, why have the sawlogs on the trucks and in the millyards appeared to get skinnier and skinnier, decade after decade? Now they look, to me, more like fence rails than like something you could get more than a couple of 2x4s out of. If I believe my eyes and my memory, it appears we have already harvested our share of the provincial forests and our children's share; and now, we are harvesting our grandchildren's share of the provincial forests.

    ReplyDelete