So the
solution to the B.C. forest industry crisis is to cut more timber, according to
the report of the Special Committee on Timber Supply released in Victoria this
week. Who can deny now that the fox is in charge of the hen house when it comes
to forest management in our once verdant province?
Oh,
I know “Supernatural B.C,” the “best place on earth” according to the
current government, is still largely
green. But take a flight to Vancouver sometime and a different picture emerges.
When you look out the window you don’t exactly see a sea of green like the
glossy tourist brochures say. What you see is a sea of clear-cuts from one end
of the province to the other. North/south, east/west, it doesn’t matter .
The pock-marked landscape runs virtually from the city limits of Cranbrook to
Vancouver and when you fly over Vancouver Island, it’s the same sickening scene
only worse.
Not
a pretty sight and it’s there for a reason.
For
over 100 years, we’ve been mining -- not logging -- the once magnificent woods
of B.C. And when you mine a material
it’s gone. You don’t get it back. It’s been the same with logging in this
besotted province. What were the first trees logged shortly after Captain
Vancouver sailed down the West Coast? Old growth Douglas firs that used to soar
straight as an arrow more than 200 feet high at the corner of Hastings and
Granville and up and down the coast.
The
British Navy, then the greatest navy on earth, found those Douglas fir logs to
be perfect for spars on their sailing ships and handy for building forts and
stockades to keep the indigenous people at bay. And by the time steam came and
sail boats were a thing of the past, those same Douglas firs were used to build
homes for the settlers that flooded into Vancouver, Victoria and the rest of
the province . And it also made fortunes for lumber barons like H. R. MacMillan
and hundreds of others who became rich as our patrimony was ripped from the
ground and used all over the province and exported around the world, especially
to the U.S., which had already ravaged its timber resources and now Asia where
the forests were cut eons ago.
Are
you getting the picture?
We
haven’t been “logging” the forest in the conventional sense of the term which
implies forest stewardship to ensure there will always be trees to log. We’ve
been clear-cutting almost every last tree for quick profit and letting nature
take care of the future. Don’t believe me? Well consider a key report
recommendation that suggests more use of
“marginally economic forest types.”
Why do we have to turn to the margins of B.C.’s once great forest lands
when we once possessed the greatest temperate rain forest on earth?
It
can be difficult for the average layman to appreciate this because when you
look out your window almost anywhere in B.C. you see trees. But most of those
trees are already committed to the major timber companies in the province or
not considered commercial to log.
And
why have we fallen into this quicksand of forestry woe? We waste almost as much
timber as we log
Logging slash (waste) on Bugaboo Creek Aug. 3,
2012.
|
and this has left us in a silvicultural hole
bigger than some of the open pit mines in the province.
If
you want more proof look at the
report’s admission that we’ve fallen so far back in recent years in keeping
forest inventory that we can’t even make a reasonable estimate of how many trees we’ve got left. And if you’re
looking to apportion blame, it’s not just the current government. It’s all provincial governments for the past
hundred years that have taken a three blind mice approach to forestry.
And
don’t fall for the line that we can blame it all on the pine beetle epidemic.
Yes, there’s a pine beetle crisis out there, but that was a crisis largely of
our own making because for years we’ve planted primarily pine beetle in areas
that were better suited for other species.
In
response to the all-party report, Forests Minister Steve Thomson says he’s
going to come up with an “action plan” within a week. I say to Mr. Thomson with
respect that he’s dreaming in Technicolor if he thinks a solution to 100 years
of abusing the forest can be found in a week.
Gerry Warner is a retired journalist and Cranbrook City Councillor. His views are his own and he does not speak for Council.
Gerry Warner is a retired journalist and Cranbrook City Councillor. His views are his own and he does not speak for Council.
To add a little balance to your viewpoint... have you noticed on your flights over BC that the Lower Mainland/Vancouver is the worst clearcut & polluted area in all of BC? That area can never be reclaimed; however, nature adapts & accommodates our need for urban areas as well as our need for wood products. I frequently fly across our province & see a green Supernatural BC, not the exaggerated devastation you claim.
ReplyDeleteThe only can conclusion that I can come to after reading Mr Warner's post is that he has decided that reading the report from the Special Committee is not required in order to comment on it. With all due respect to Mr Warner this is a truly embarrassing coulmn that has less to do with what is contained in the report and more to do with his "Perceptions".
ReplyDeleteI have read the report and I recommend that Mr Warner do the same. Their are no "solutions" presented in the report, only recommendations to assess the damage the Mountain Pine Beetle has had on the timber inventories of the central interior and develop a plan to bridge the gap in the mid-term (20 to 60 years) timber supply that will keep people working in communities that have already suffered through the devestating effects the beetle infestation has had over the last two decades.
The recommendations contained in the report have been made by a commiitee, the "foxes" that Mr Warner so disrespectfully refers to, that include MLA's from the ridings most deeply impacted as well as Columbia-Revelstoke MLA Norm MacDonald. This committee took over 650 submissions from stake holders who include not only industry but First Nations, enviromental and community groups and local governments.
Mr Warner's conclusions regarding the use of "marginally economic forest types" are not only incorrect and irrevelvant to what is contained within the report but have been made, in my opinion, to intentionally mislead the reader to coming to the conclusion Mr Warner has invented.
"Don't believe me?" Take a look at what is in the report and then re-read Mr Warner's column which I beleive can only be described as a callous and embarrassing effort.
Ken Dunsire
If Jerry Warner is so wrong, Guys, why have the sawlogs on the trucks and in the millyards appeared to get skinnier and skinnier, decade after decade? Now they look, to me, more like fence rails than like something you could get more than a couple of 2x4s out of. If I believe my eyes and my memory, it appears we have already harvested our share of the provincial forests and our children's share; and now, we are harvesting our grandchildren's share of the provincial forests.
ReplyDelete