November 12, 2014
Letter to editor:
During Cranbrook’s municipal electoral
campaign period, much has been said about the need for more spending on
infrastructure, particularly
roads. The most critical of the challengers
for office have also been critical of city tax rates. Apparently some folks can hold two contradictory ideas
simultaneously.
Let’s look at the
funding and spending facts. Limited taxation power combines with
off-loading from other governments to put more demands on fewer municipal
dollars. In January 2013 the Canadian Centre for
Policy Alternatives (CCPA) published a report showing that the federal
government has off-loaded responsibilities to the provinces, which in turn
off-loaded responsibility for infrastructure and for program delivery to municipalities
– without providing the necessary funds.
Off-loading (or devolution) is a real problem for municipalities and
First Nation communities.In
BC, the Columbia Institute found that “83.6 per
cent of the locally elected leaders surveyed ... said federal and provincial
downloading of costs onto local governments is a major problem for their
community”.
In the 1990s the federal
government cut billions of dollars in transfer payments to provinces, which
passed the problems on to municipalities with
devastating effect. On December 27 2013, Calgary’s mayor
Naheed Nenshi summed it up thus: “Legally, and constitutionally, cities have
no framework. … Right now, the legislation that governs the city of Calgary —
which is larger than five provinces — is exactly the same as the legislation
that governs a summer town of 100 people”.
Despite the inter provincial differences, municipalities across the country find
themselves in the same leaky boat as Calgary. Nenshi
called for an honest discussion about taxes.
“Politicians need to stop being scared of that [tax] conversation and
really open it up to people saying: ‘The services you need cost’ ... we have to be realistic.”It
looks like some Cranbrook mayoral and council candidates and citizens need to
get realistic too.
Joyce
Green
No comments:
Post a Comment