It is interesting that in today’s Council package
there is a motion from Councillor Davis concerning how Council representatives
deal with their responsibilities on the Regional District Board. His concern appears to be around two
decisions endorsed by Council’s representatives.
https://cranbrook.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentList.aspx?ID=2758
https://cranbrook.civicweb.net/Documents/DocumentList.aspx?ID=2758
One decision concerned the expression of
dissatisfaction with the infrastructure funding levels provided by the Federal
Government for Municipal projects.
The other decision concerned the rejection by our two
representatives of the creation by the Province of the resort municipality of
Jumbo.
Davis bases his motion on the fact that at no time
were these issues discussed as a topic of Council deliberations and yet both
issues have community wide interest.
In the Tyee on January 21st Andrew MacCleod
states in the eight hopes for the next BC Government,
Infrastructure upgrades. The Union of B.C. Municipalities
is the umbrella group for local governments in the province. President Mary
Sjostrom stressed the organization is non-partisan but will have the same
requests regardless of who wins the May election.
"Certainly infrastructure for our members is our
number one priority," said Sjostrom. There is a new federal plan coming in
2014, which will bring together the three levels of government and it needs to
have dedicated funds for local infrastructure, she said.
There is also a need for local governments to have the
ability to raise money for all the things they now do, she said. "You've
heard us many times say services have been increased beyond the traditional
utilities and roads," she said.
Ways the province allows local governments to raise money
have not, however, changed, she said. "The revenue today we rely on has
remained the same over the last 50 years."
When 140 of BC’s mayors met in September of 2012, on the topic of
infrastructure the BC Mayors’ Caucus endorsed the following statement:
“We agree that our communities require
immediate action to provide stable, predictable, long term infrastructure
funding from federal and provincial governments, to meet municipal needs as
defined by each community’s priorities. This statement affirms and complements the
efforts of UBCM and FCM to address the infrastructure needs of communities to
ensure social, economic and environmental well-being.”
On Friday January 11th it
was reported in the Townsman, ‘MLA expresses frustration with local
government’, that our MLA Bill Bennett was putting out the call to Council to
stop asking the province for more money. In his talk with reporters he listed
many items, including infrastructure.
It is not as though any of these items
are new. It is not as though MLA
Bennett has not been involved in discussions.
It is not as though Councillor Davis has not heard or been part of UBCM, or
Council table discussions involving planning and priority setting. It is not as though local politicians are
not aware of current financial constraints but that does not mean priorities
need to be abandoned or frustration should be cause to give up.
It would appear Councillor Davis is both out of step with many local
residents and also the majority of Municipally Elected Officials.
I would prefer that City Council does have discussions around RDEK issues which affect Cranbrook. I'm surprised actually that this is not common practice, particularly given this Council's over the top concern about public consultation and open dialogue. Surely they can find time in the 2-hour marathon meetings.
ReplyDeleteI know I was chocked when our two votes on the RDEK Council affirmed the motion to turn the decision regarding Jumbo to our Provincial Government. At that time, (I believe it was 2009) Mayor Manjak and Councillor Schsneider who were our 2 reps voted for the province to make this important decision. Certainly their voting pattern did NOT reflect the view and wishes of the people of Cranbrook. I believe our present representatives should be voting to reflect the wishes of the constituents they serve.
ReplyDelete